Leave No Youth Behind speaks on July 30 elections period

NAYO Director Misheck Gondo

By Zim Sentinel

Youth advocacy organisation and civic pressure group Leave No Youth Behind, which was active in mobilizing youths to vote in the July 30 polls,  has released a statement in which it raised concern on the post-election violence last Wednesday, which resulted in the death of six people in Harare and applauded the youth for taking part in a peaceful election.

Speaking at a press conference organised by the National Association of Youth Organisation (NAYO) in Harare this morning, NAYO Director, Misheck Gondo, said both MDC Alliance and ZANU PF were reluctant in taking responsibility for last Wednesday’s chaos.

“Mostly young people took to the streets to protest, political parties denied ownership of the youth, though most of them were seen in MDC Alliance regalia, which resulted in the death of six people and leaving many others injured, an act contrary to the spirit of Ubuntu,” he said.

The organisation highlighted that it has noted a dramatic improvement in the participation of the youth in national politics.

“Leave No Youth Behind noticed an increased participation of youth in political processes as compared to the 2013 elections”

Gondo also said the organisation was equally concerned by the expectation of equating youthfulness and naivety in making political decisions.

“We are also concerned by a rhetoric that continues to equate youthfulness with political naivety. As we have stated elsewhere, young people are the pulse of the nation, we are not the leaders of tomorrow only but of today as well,” he said.

Leave No Youth Behind also highlighted that it had made recommendations after its involvement in the 2018 electoral cycle to political parties, civil society and the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC) in relation to upholding of the fundamental human rights by “… putting in place mechanisms to protect youth from exploitation and manipulation which is rife during electoral periods.”

Among the recommendations was the need for state institutions and traditional leaders to win back “legitimacy and trust” by the people, promoting freedom of expression and independence of the media and “invoking of draconian and restrictive laws”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *